Less is more
We've got a whole lot of sex these days. What we don't have is a whole
lot of fun with it. We've left the shadow of our repressed Victorian
ancestors. Sex is out of the closet and the bedroom and right in the
center of the family room. On TV, Radio, stage and screen, in the
newspapers, funny papers, and our daily conversations. Kindergarten
teachers speak more explicitly about sex than their grandfather's family
doctors did. There isn't a secret left to it now. We can hear how to
do it, watch it being done, and do it unto others without the law or the
family getting in our way.
We've been told that's healthy for us and our children. Experts say
that if we see and hear about sex every day in every way, we'll develop
healthy sexual habits and lifestyles, free of the evils of repression.
It must be true. That's why the rate of teenage pregnancies has gone
down, why sexually transmitted diseases are a thing of the past, why
there are so few prostitutes now, and why the divorce rate is so low.
Right?
If we're so open and candid about sex, why can't we get it right? Not
only in our lifestyles, but in our pleasure in it?
Knowledge is not always power. It doesn't always bring bliss. I
recently saw an article in a college newspaper telling readers how to
perk up their boring sex lives. College students needing to know how to
find sex exciting? That's so depressing. In days of not so yore, the
only creature more eager to have sex than a college student was a bull
in rut. But it makes sense. If you treat sex like exercise and divorce
it from the soul, it becomes about as thrilling as a walk on a
treadmill. Sure, your heart will race, but it will not be involved.
Pornography palls too. The first time you glimpse it, your brain
sizzles. You goggle guiltily, as repelled as fascinated and excited,
with a THEY'REREALLYDOING IT!! stare. But the next time your stare
isn't quite as wide. And the next, you start noticing hair styles,
scars, tattoos and moles. The thrill is definitely gone. After all,
there are only so many ways part A fits into slot B. Yawn.
People joke about Romance writers penning "hot books." You can find
hotter on TV almost any night. But you won't find much more thrilling.
Fiction allows us to cloak and disguise, embellish and infer. Romance
novels aren't sex manuals, they deal with intangible ecstasy. They
explore the human heart and how it links to the rest of the body. Most
of all, Romance novels put the love back into lovemaking. And love, and
love alone, is what makes sex more. Life too, but that's another topic.
* Do I write novels with the ultimate embrace? Of course. Have I
written novels without it? Yup. Some of my "Classic" Regencies. But
some criticized THE DUKE'S WAGER, the very first one I wrote, for being
too sensual and sexually explicit. Every time that happens, I urge them
to show me where I was explicit. They can't. Because I wasn't. I just
used inference. Their own imagination did the rest.
Less IS more.
|
Copyright © 2009, Mary S. Van Deusen |