Navy Commissioners' Office,
January 10, 1821.
In reply to the queries propounded by the honorable Chairman of the Naval Committee, of the
House of Representatives, in his letter to you, of the 5th instant, which you were pleased to refer to this
board, the Commissioners of the navy have now the honor to afford such information as they possess.
Query 1st. "Cannot the navy ration be probably|
procured at less than 25 cents, and at how much less?"
The navy ration can probably be procured for less than 25 cents. By the contracts lately made, the first
cost will not exceeed 16 cents. At this time provisions are known to be unusually low, and owing to
this cirumstance, and the competition produced among the bidders for public contracts, by advertising for
all articles required, the ration is procured at a price less, considerably, than at any period since the establishment
of our navy.
It should, however, be observed, taht the component parts of the rations are all of a perishable nature, and that,
on board of our ships, they are unavoidably exposed to the vicissitudes of every climate -- hence, with every care
that can be taken of them, they are, in a greater or less degree, liable to damage before they can be used.
The expense of transportation should, also, be added to the original cost. These considerations render it expedient to prepare
the estimates, as to the cost of the rations, so aas to make a liberal allowance for the damages to which they are liable.
Hence, althought the first cost of the ration will not exceed 16 cents, it is calculated at 25 cents.
The estimates for 1821 contemplate a provision of 1,526,430 rations, deliverable in kind, for actual
consumption, and 376,497 rations to be paid for in money to the officers entitled to them by law. The former
is one ration per day for every person in the service. The latter are undrawn rations, which
the officers are entitled to, but which, not drawing in kind, (not being provided for them,) are paid for in money.
With respect to the rations coming under the former description, it may be observed, that if they should not, included all the losses
which may be sustained, cost the price named in the estimate, no more than their actual cost will be drawn from the Treasury.
The balance will remain undrawn and unapplied, and subject to such disposition as the legislature may please to decide.
With respect to the rations which are not drawn by, or provided for, the officers, but to which they are by law
entitled, and for which they are paid in money, the price has, since the year 1814, been fixed at 25 cents;
thirteen years previous experience having satisfied the government that 20 cents was less than a fair average price.
Prior to 1801, the price of the ration was 28 cents; in 1801, it was reduced to 20, and, as before stated, it was, in 1814,
raised to 25, and has never since been changed. This price may be more than the present cost of the ration,
but next year it may be less. At the time the officers were receiving 28 cents the ration, that rice was known to be less
than the actual cost. The officers might, at that period, have drawn their rations and sold them to a profit;
and after the price was reduced to 20 cents, although an apparent change in the market seemed to favor the
reduction, yet it was fully ascertained that the price, on an average, was considerably higher; and, upon this ground,
it was fixed at 25 cents, as a fair average price. The officers now consider, and indeed, have always considered,
their undrawn rations as a part of their pay, and have made their calculations accordingly.
The officers, in providing their own tables, are unavoidably subject to pay the market prices demanded for the articles
they require. These markets may be as various as the ports they may proceed to in various parts of the world. It is, also, the custom
of the service, to provide, whenever a vessel goes into port, fresh meat for the crew; and on such occasions, we are subject to pay
the market prices demanded for such fresh provisions. This custom could not be dispensed with; the health of the
crews requires its observance; and it is obviously proper to consider this contingency also in the estimate.
Query 2d. "
Is it not a departmental regulation|
which authorizes the officers to commute
all their rations but one into money?"
As this is not a regulation directed by any law of Congress, the Commissioners presume that
it was made by the department, and custom has established its convenience. The officers
are generally in a situation which would render it inconvenient to them to draw all their
rations; if they were to draw them, they could not consume them; and if they do not draw them,
it would not seem to comport with the principles of justice to deprive them of their value.
They furnish their own tables, from time to time, as they go into port, but must draw one
ration, because one ration is actually provided in kind for them -- and there is a necessity
that it should be provided, in order to guard effectually against events which might arise from
the improvidence of any individual in the navy.
The principle of permitting officers to commute their rations into money, is universally observed
in every service with which the Commissioners are acquainted -- it enables the officers from time
to time to lay in their stores. If this custom were prohibited, and the whole number of rations
to which the officers are by law entitled were to be provided and delivered in kind to the, the
capacity of the ships to receive provisions and stores would be proportionately diminished -- under
the present regulation the stores of the officers occupy but an inconsiderable space -- change it,
and you necessarily have to less the quantity which would otherwise be provided for the crew.
By a change these inconveniences would arise, without being attended with any conceivable benefit.
Back To Top
Query 3d. "
How many commissioned officers|
of each grade will be necessarily
wanting for actual service during 1821,
if the present naval force should be
retained in service?"
The Commissioners presume that it was intended to comprehend in this query, not only
the commission but the warrant officers; and that the object is to ascertain the number
of each indispensably necessary for the ships and vessels intended to be kept in
service during the year 1821; and thus constuing and understanding the object of the query,
they have to state, taht the ships and vessels intended to be kept in service during the year 1821,
could not well be navigated and commanded with less than the following number of officers, viz:
|5||Captains of the navy|
This statement, it will be perceived, does not include any of the ships or vessels in ordinary,
or any of the Navy Yards or stations -- neither does it include any supernumery officers of any
description, or provide for any casualty. It comprehends only the actual number required to be on board
the ships in service.
In officers our vessels in times of peace, it has heretofore been the practice to attach to them
an extra number of junior officers, in order to afford them such opportunities of improvement
in their professions, as would fit them for command in time of war: and the Commissioners beg leave, sir,
to obsserve, that they would regret extremely if this practice were to be discontinued -- as it would be depriving our young
officers of the only fit school open to them. In no possible way can a young man be fitted for the command of
a vessel of war, but by servicing a regular-apprenticeship on board of one; and the cheapest possible way of
training and qualifying them for the service, is, assuredly, to place extra numbers on board of such vessels
as our kept in service. It is not by preparing ships alone, that we can hope to render our navy efficient.
The experience of our officers must, to render it so, keep pace with the gradual increase.
To commit the command of our ships to persons ignorant of any of the departments or duties of command,
would be to jeopardize the reputation of the navy. Inexperienced unskilful bravery cannot hold the combat
against veteran skill with any hope of success.
In the merchant service seamanship may, it is true, be learnt -- but that only, and that constitutes but a
very small part of the education of a navy officer -- whose mind should be early habituated to the duties of
obedience and command -- of discipline and subordination -- to the study of mathematics, gunnery, and the whole theory
and practice of naval tactics; and it is on board of ships of war only, that such habits and requirements
can be obtained.
Query 4d. "Are there not more pursers than the|
public service requires?"
There are, it appears, at this time, 46 pursers on the roll. The vessels in service, in ordinary,
and the Navy Yards and shore stations, are estimated to require 39, leaving, apparently, seven supernumeraries. The rules of the service
require that pursers should settle their accounts at the end of every cruise. It would be very expensive
to keep a ship waiting till her purser could settle his accounts, which frequently requires two or three
months -- other pursers must be ready to take the place of those who are compelled to leave their ships for
this purpose. Hence, for the good of the service, it appears necessary to have a few supernumerary pursers.
Query 5d. "
Are there no officers or others, such as|
superintendants, storekeeps, &c. who might
be dispensed with at the several Navy Yards
and stations, without injury to the
So far as respects the navy Yards, the Commissioners of the Navy have to satate, that ever since the
establishment of their office, their attention has been particularly turned to this subject; and they
have, from time to time, curtailed the number of persons employed; and they have reduced it and the expense
as low as, in their opinion, the public service will admit. They can, with confidence, state, that they know of no officer
that could be dispensed with in any of our Navy Yards, without dispensing wiht that principle of checks,
and system of accountability, essential to economy. Prior to the establishment of the board,
no property account was kept -- at present there is the same accountability for property as for money, and the
office of storekeeper is essential to this accountability.
Query 6d. "Could any new organization be made|
in the marine corps, which would promote
economy, without injuring its efficiency?"
This appears to the Commissioners properly a military quesiton; and as they have never turned their
attention to subjects of that nature, they do not feel themselves competent to form a satisfactory opinion upon it.
Back To Top
|Cost of vessels of war|
Query 7d. "What is the estimated average cost per annum,|
of vessels of the following classes, respectively,
viz: 12, 16, 20, 32, 36, 44, 74 -- 1st, on cruize;
2d, in ordinary; 3d, when dismantled?"
The Commissioners having had reference to a series of estimates made at various periods during the
existence of the navy, have to state, that the following appears to be about the aveerage estimated
cost per annum, on cruize, viz:
|12 to 14||$ 20,595|
|16 to 18||37,440|
|20 to 24||45,700|
|32 gun frigate||74,900|
|36 gun frigate||97,500|
|44 gun frigate||112,000|
|74 gun ship||180,350|
The annual expense of vessels in ordinary, exclusively of any repairs to which they may be subject,
may be estimated as follows, viz:
|12 to 14||$ 2,477 00|
|16 to 18||2,664 50|
|20 to 24||3,279 00|
|32 gun frigate||4,205 75|
|36 gun frigate||4,604 25|
|44 gun frigate||5,002 75|
|74 gun ship||6,432 50|
With respect to the annual cost of vessels dismantled, the Commissioners have to observe, that they know
of no difference in the expense of vessels in that state and when placed in ordinary, as dismantling
is a necessary preliminary step to their being placed in ordinary.
I have the honor to be,
With great respect,
Your most obedient servent,
Honorable Smith Thompson,
Secretary of the Navy
Back To Top