|Livingston, by Ruth Lawrence|
|The Royal Society, The Grape and New Jersey|
Maj.Gen. William Alexander, Lord Stirling
Sarah Livingston, baptized at Albany, November 7, 1725; died in March, 1805; married, March 1, 1748,
General William Alexander, known by courtesy as Earl of Stirling, son of James Alexander, born in 1726,
in New York City. He received an excellent education and was especially proficient in mathematics and
astronomy. After his father died, in 1756, William engaged with his widowed mother in the provision
business, and because of this he became commissary for the British army in the French and Indian War. Later
he served as aide-de0camp and secretary to Governor William Shirley, and when the latter was being tried for
neglect of duty William Alexander took up his vindication vigorosly, journeying to Europe to testify in
Governor Shirley's cause, writing the noted brochure, "The Conduct of Major-General Shirley Briefly Sated."
At about this time also, his father having been heir presumptive to the earldom of Stirling, William prosecuted his claim to the title before the House of Lords. This effort proved futile. Returning to America in 1761 he at once assumed a prominent part in colonial affairs. He became surveyor general and a member of the Provincial Congress. As an ardent patriot he entered the Revolutionary army with the rank of colonel, commanding in October, 1775, the battalion of East New Jersey. A British transport, the Blue Mountain Valley, captured by him in January, 1776, near Sandy Hook and conveyed into Perth Amboy, brought Colonel Alexander the thanks of Congress and promotion to the rank of brigadier-general. During his brief command of the troops of New York City, while General Lee was active in the South, General Alexander continued Lee's policy against the Tories, severed by means of warships all communications between Staten Island and Long Island, and constructed new barracks for expected augmentation of troops.
In May of that year he was sent by General Washington to inspect highland fortifications, and he recommended the construction of a redoubt at West Point, "not only for the preservation of Fort Constitution, but for its own importance." In August, 1776, with a command of one thousand five hundred men detailed by General Putnam, General Alexander was sent to oppose the advance of General Grant on Brooklyn. A number of skirmishes resulted, but a battle was avoided. During the famous battle of Long Island, on August 27th, his brigade opened the fight, and he was the first to discover the enemy's triumph over the American flank. He at once attacked Cornwallis, but with disaster, his brigade being nearly cut to pieces. He himself was taken prisoner by de Heister, but shortly exchanged. He had, however, accomplished his object which was to facilitate the retreat of the American army.
In February, 1777, he attained the rank of major-general. Contrary to Washington's orders, General Alexander on June 24, 1776, awaited an attack at Metuchen, New Jersey, which resulted in the defeat of his division, the loss of two guns and one hundred and fifty men. His courage and discretion were noteworthy at the battles of Brandywine and Germantown, where he commanded the reserves under Washington. By his brilliant tactics in posting and handling a battery of light artillery as leader of one of the divisions under Washington at the battle of Monmouth, General Alexander repelled with heavy loss the enemy's attempt to turn his flank. At Paulus Hook in 1779, while in command in New Jersey he surprised a British force. He was sent with two thousand five hundred men to attack the British position on Staten Island, but was unsuccessful. In 1781 he was in command at Albany.
Died January 15, 1783, five days after peace preliminaries were agreed upon.
R.P. McCormick, NJ Historical Society, Volume LXXXI, Number 2, April 1953
The potent influence of the 'Society instituted at London for the Encouragement of Arts,
Manufactures and Commerce' in promoting economic diversification in the American colonies has long been recognized,
though probably not adequately appreciated. Illustrative of the stimulus given by the Society to one of the
numerous phases of colonial agriculture which it encouraged is this account of the response of two New Jersey men to the Society's
offer of a premium for the planting of voneyards. One of the men, Edward Antill, received the largest individual
premium ever awarded by the Society to an American. The other, William Alexander, the self-styled Earl of Stirling,
was honoured with a gold medal. Both recipients, and most particularly Antill, were inspired by the Society to make
notable contributions to the history of American viticulture.
Almost from the establishment of the first English settlement in North America there had been efforts to cultivate wine-producing vineyards. Spurring these endeavors was the hope that both the mother country and colonies might be relieved of their dependence on foreign sources of wine. Perhaps the earliest attempt to develop a vineyard was made in Virginia in about 1619, with indifferent results. Subsequently there were many other venture sin grape growing in Virginia, some with strong official encouragement but all doomed to failure. In South Carolina, French Huguenots, especially skilled in viticulture, made repeated but uniformly unencouraging attempts to create a wine industry. Indeed similar unpromising experiments were tried in nearly every colony southward of New England. With rare exceptions attention was centred on the problem of ascertaining which varieties of the European grape (vitis vinifera)would thrive in the American environment. Native American vines, which grew in profusion throughout the colonies, were largely ignored.
It was with some awareness of this background of failure that the Society in 1758 offered a premium of 100 pounds to the colonist who, within seven yeras, should be the first to produce five tuns of red or white wine of acceptable quality. Presumably it was believed that if encouragement were given to continued experimentation with transplanted varieties of vitis vinifera, an adaptable variety might ultimately be found. Despite the generous amount of the premium, which continued to be advertised until 1765, no planters came forward to claim the award.
Undaunted, and still persuaded of the importance of developing a supply of wine within the Empire, the Society renewed its efforts in a new form in 1762. A premium of 200 pounds was to be granted for the greatest number of vines, not less than five hundred, which produced 'those Sorts of Wines now consumed in Great Britain.' The vineyard, in order to qualify, must have been properly planted, fenced, and cultivated between 1st April, 1762 and 1st April, 1767. One such premium was advertised for the region north of the Delaware River and others for the southern colonies and Bermuda. A second premium of 50 pounds was to go to the planter of the next greatest quantity of vines, not less than one hundred in number. The terminal date of the offer was subsequently extended in 1770.
WILLIAM ALEXANDER, LORD STIRLING
"The making of wine [he wrote on 6th August], also, is worth the atteniton of Government. Without its aid, the cultivation of the vine will be very slow; for of all the vines in Europe, we do not yet know which of them will suit this climate; and until that is ascertained by experiment, our people will not plant vineyards; few of us are able, and a much less number willing, to make the experiment. I have lately imported about twenty different sorts, and have planted two vineyards, one in this Province [New York] and one in New Jersey; but I find the experiments tedious, expensive, and uncertain; for after eight or ten years' cultivation I shall perhaps be obliged to reject nine tenths of them as unfit for the climate, and then begin new vineyards from the remainder. But, however tedious, I am determined to go through with it. Yet I could wish to be assisted in it, I would then try to a greater extent, and would the sooner be able to bring the cultivation of the grape into general use."
It is entirely probably that Stirling was at this time aware of the Society's interest in encouraging the planting of vineyards, for he had become a member while resident in London in 1760. The son of James Alexander, who had fled from Scotland in 1716 after participating in the Jacobite rising of that time, William was born in New York City in 1726 and inherited a position of wealth and prominence. After serving briefly in the French and Indian War, he journeyed to England in 1756 and remained there for five years, during most of which time hewas engaged in a fruitless attempt to secure recognition of his claim to the lapsed Earldom of Stirling. Upon his return to America, he began the development of a considerble estate at Baskingridge, Somerset County, New Jersey, which soon became his permanent residence. He was appointed a member of the Governor's Council and assumed a leading role in the political, economic and social llife of New Jersey. With the outbreak of the Revolution, he cast his considerable prestige and ability on the side of Independence and won distinction as Major-General in the Continental Army.
A persistent advocate of agricultural improvement and a fervent believer in the mercantilist concept of the economic relationship of the colonies to the mother country, Antill viewed his viticultural project as a patriotic cause. 'When I first undertook a Vineyard,' he wrote at the end of his life, 'I can without the least spark of vanity say, I did it for the good of my country, and from a love of mankind...' He explained to the Society that when he learned premiums were to be offered for various kinds of agricultural prodducts, he gave careful consideration to which of them might be grown in New Jersey, weighing such factors as soil, topography and climate. He concluded that vineyards were well suited to his region. It was not the American environment, he maintained, but rather the ignorance and indifference of the American farmer that waas responsible for the lack of vineyards in the colonies.
"The People of Ameridca are generally unacquainted with the Art of improving & cultivating of Lands to advantage; they jogg on in the beaten Paths of their Ancestors ... I have been thought by some Gentlemen as well as by Farmers very shimsical in attempting a Vineyard; it is looked upon as an absurd undertaking, as a farce upon Nature, as though I meant to extort from her what is not in her power to yield. As if America alone was to be denyed those cheering comforts which Nature with a bountiful hand Stretches forth to the rest of the World."
When the Society's Committee of Colonies and Trade met on 27th October, 1767, it had before it certificates relating to the vineyards established by Lord Stirling and Edward Antill. It then resolved that Stirling was entitled to the first premium of 200 pounds and, oddly enough, adopted a similar resolution with respect to Antill. Some weeks later, when the report of the Committee was made to the meeting of the Society, that part which related to Lord Stirling was disagreed to and the consideration of the remainder was postponed. At the next meeting of the Society on 2nd December, 1767, it was resolved that Antill should be awarded the first premium; no mention was made of Lord Stirling. Subsequently, on 24th December, the Society voted to award a gold medal 'to the Rt Honble the Earl of Stirling for having planted 2100 vintes in North America in pursuance of the Views of the Society.'
What the precise nature of the disagreement was between the Committee of Colonies and Trade and the Society is not revealed. Robert Dossie, who was at the time a member of the Committee, stated that Lord Stirling 'failed in some essential points of certification,' but he does not explain what these points might have been. The Chairman of the Committee, ehose report had been disagreed to by the Society, declined to serve any longer in that post, which suggests that the case of Lord Stirling had engendered some ill-feeling. It is even possible that the Society's action may have been influenced by the fact that William Alexander had chosen to assume a dignity to which he was not properly entitled and which he had been forbidden to assume by the House of Lords.
Antill was deeply grateful to the Society for both the honourable recognition and the material reward that had been conferred on him, and he continued to communicate to the Secretary of the Society his enthusiastic plans for furthering the cause of American viticulture. He had already proposed that the Society should finance a small, model vineyard where intensive, long-range experiments oculd be carried forward systematically. The cost he extimated at a modest 200 pounds for seven years. Later, in 1768, he put forth a similar proposal in the New York Gazette, on this occasion appealing to 'the Gentlemen of publick Spirit, in the different colonies, or Bodies of Men associated for promoting Arts, Manufacturers, and Agriculture' for support. He also reported that he was writing a treatise on viticulture 'collected from the best Authors, from the Information of the most knowing among the French and Germans, and from many Experiments which I have made for my own satisfaction.' It was his constant endeavour to stimulate other farmers to plant vineyards. 'I have set it on such a footing by some Things which I have Published,' he wrote, 'that some People in the Colony of New York & many more in the Colony of Pennsylvania are become Sanguine in the attempt...'
His zeal for agricultural improvement was not confined to viticulture alone. In the same letter in which he acknowledged the Society's bounty, he set forth at length 'the best and cheapest method for raising and fattening Hogs, for raising of black cattle without Milk, for keeping up and increasing the Milk of Cows in Winter, and for stall feeding of Oxen and sheep'. In In essence, all of these methods involved the use of boiled potatoes as feed. Antill was pleased to communicate this yet Secret and new discovery to the Honorable Society for the good of the People of England', and in anticipation of 'a premium in some Degree adequate to the Merit'. In the same letter he also dealt with the medicinal qualities of rhubarb and the suitability of olive yards to the southern colonies.
Transcending even his interest in agriculture, however, was his patriotic love for his country. 'I read with pleasure, nay with transport, the proceedings of this most grand and benificent [sic] Society', he exclaimed; 'I see with great Satisfaction the Arts, Agriculture, and Commerce rising and improving from Every quarter, and a foundation laid for surprising effects from every Branch and for great increase of wealth and power to the Nation which I pray God to Establish Forever.'
Perhaps Antill's greatest accomplishment and surely his most important contribution to American viticulture was his 'treatise' on the subject. Entitled 'An Essay on the cultivation of the Vine, and the making and preserving of Wine, suited to the different Climates in North-America', it was published posthumously in 1771 in the first volume of the Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. In forwarding the piece for publication in May, 1769, Antill wrote 'I have at last, after many hard struggles, and many a painful hour, labouring under a tedious disorder, finished the essay on the cultivation fo the Vine ...'. He had recently removed from his estate at Raritan Landing to Shrewbury, New Jersey, where he died on 15th August, 1770. The first publication by an American on any fruit, Antill's eighty-page essay remained the authorative work on the subject for more than fifty years. It borrowed heavily from Columella's classical Of Husbandry in Twelve Books, from Philip Miller's The Gardener's Dictionary, and from other contemporary authorities, but incorporated as well the results of Antill's own experiments.
THE FAILURE OF TRANSPLANTING FOREIGN VINE STOCK
"The reason for my being silent about Vines that are natives of America is, that I know but little of them, [he wrote in his 'Essay'] having but just entered upon a trial of them, when my very ill state of health forbad me to proceed. From what little observation I have been able to make, I look upon them to be more intractable than that of Europe, they will undergo a hard struggle indeed, before they will submit to a low and humble state, a state of abject slavery ..."
The futility of endeavouring to transplant vitis vinifera to America was at last being recognized. The astute Robert Dossie was persuaded that the proper course was to develop the native vines, and he was doubtless instrumental in inducing the Society in 1768 to offer medals for thier cultivation. The anonymous author of American Husbandry, published in London in 1775, was most insistent that American grapes should be preferred to the European varieties. Antill's work may be adjudged a failure. But such failures were a necessary prelude to ultimate success. The encouragement that he, and many others, received from the Society, was instrumental in producing the knowledge that was at last to make possible the effective exploitation of the American grape.
Copyright © 2003, InterMedia Enterprises