PAGE 316: CHAPTER VII
out a sketch of such which you especially judge to
be most important, and send it to me." — In a letter
dated March, 1792, there is the following paragraph: "Upon looking over the papers, as they
now stand corrected by the Synod, I find the first,
third, and fourth parts, may be easily brought into
form, without alterations or additions of much consequence; but what to do with the second part,
which respects our Ecclesiastical Assemblies, I do
not yet know: as it now stands, it appears deficient.
To make it intelligible, and answer the purpose of
a standard for the information of all our members, I
believe some additions will be found necessary. I
have not yet digested particulars, but will send you
a sketch of them as soon as I can get them ready,"
The following March, he wrote again: — "I have
discovered that to make the whole ready for the
press, will unavoidably demand more time than can
be found previous to the Synod in May; I, therefore,
now put in a plea for an abatement to any promises
on my part, or injunctions on the part of the Synod
for that purpose."
"An idea has occurred to me respecting this
business, which I wish to communicate and receive your advice upon. I find the Synods in
Holland, &c. as they successively brought forward
|
PAGE 317: CHAPTER VII
their Church orders, always retained what the former and more ancient Churches had done. This
they made their text, and added only what might
be considered essentially applicable to themselves.
This is remarkably the case in the acts of the
Synod of Dort, 1618-19. Although several new
circumstances had occurred, wliich rendered some
alterations necessary, yet in their solemn revision
of the Church orders, they retain almost word for
word, the rules of the Synod held at the Hague,
1586, and whatever they judged to be local and
temporary, they added afterwards in their post acta.
If we apply this to ourselves, and wish to retain
the same attachment to the ancient Reformed
Churches, our line for procedure will be easily
marked out. * * * * Suppose we should,
then, by a careful inspection from one article to
another, collect a short but precise system of explanations, which as the express work of our own
Synod, may be added as an organizing act; and
then the original articles, together with our organization, will serve to exhibit a clear, and at the same
time, a respectable Church order. * * * If
we should adopt this mode, then the exact and prudent translation, &c. of the original articles will be
only the smallest part of the work. Our post acta
will require the greatest deliberation. In this view
you will acquiesce in my expectation that the work
|